Legal Opinion
Ario v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 30, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER BY
Judge COLINS.
Joel S. Ario, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in his capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company has filed Objections to Defendants Deloitte & Touche and Jan A. Lommele notices of intent to serve a subpoena to attend and testify pursuant to Rule Pa. R.Civ. Pro. 234.1 on James Shee-han, Mark Campbell, Fritz Bittenbender, and Timothy Reeves. The Court concludes the objections have merit as Defendants have failed to establish an extraordinary circumstance that overcomes the deliberative process privilege that the Liquidator…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- COM. EX REL. UNIFIED JUD. SYS. v. VartanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. VartanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Gould v. City of AliquippaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Arvonio v. PNC Wealth Management, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013
- Bandru v. Fawzen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2015
- Brogan v. Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald, LLP, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.