Legal Opinion
Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 5, 2018No. 387 C.D. 2017; 436 C.D. 2017PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUDGE COVEY
The Township of Neshannock (Township) appeals from the Lawrence County Common Pleas Court's February 28, 2017 interlocutory order (February 28, 2017 Order) denying in part the Township's Motion in Limine to Exclude Privileged Documents (Motion to Exclude). Kirila Contractors, Inc. (Kirila) and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (F & D) cross-appeal from the same order, which declared specified numbered exhibits inadmissible at trial because they were fully or partially privileged as attorney-client communications or attorney work product. There are five issues…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re JOHN DOE CORPORATION. JOHN DOE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoena to Ray M. Vargas. Sangre De Cristo Community Mental Health Service, Inc. v. United States of America, Ray M. Vargas v. Santiago Campos, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carrier Corp. v. WCAB (Haugh)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- City of Pittsburgh v. A. Murray & The Pittsburgh Post GazetteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- D. Scarborough v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- H. Hoffman v. Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- J. Mancini v. County of Northampton Personnel Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.