Legal Opinion

W.G. Fairfield Company v. The Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2002No. 00-4548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Circuit Judge.

W.G. Fairfield argues that the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission acted arbitrarily or capriciously by affirming a citation for violating two Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations. We affirm.

I

There are no disputed facts. Digging a trench beside a six-lane stretch of 1-71 in Ohio, a highway construction crew of Fair-field employees unexpectedly struck a cable. To see if the cable had been pulled loose, one of the workers, Floyd Wolfe, walked across the three northbound lanes of the interstate to inspect a junction box located at the median.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Blum v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and Vy Lactos Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. RAY EVERS WELDING CO., Petitioner, v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Alfredo Perez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Blackman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Fabi Construction Co. v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. Ayoubi v. Wexford health Sources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Orozco v. KinkDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API