W.G. Fairfield Company v. The Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission Secretary of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARRIS, Circuit Judge.
W.G. Fairfield argues that the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission acted arbitrarily or capriciously by affirming a citation for violating two Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations. We affirm.
I
There are no disputed facts. Digging a trench beside a six-lane stretch of 1-71 in Ohio, a highway construction crew of Fair-field employees unexpectedly struck a cable. To see if the cable had been pulled loose, one of the workers, Floyd Wolfe, walked across the three northbound lanes of the interstate to inspect a junction box located at the median.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blum v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and Vy Lactos Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- RAY EVERS WELDING CO., Petitioner, v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Perez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Blackman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Fabi Construction Co. v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Ayoubi v. Wexford health Sources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
- Orozco v. KinkDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.