Legal Opinion

Schweiker v. Hogan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 1982No. 81-213PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

At issue in this case are the meaning and validity of § 1903(f) of the Social Security Act, 81 Stat. 898, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1396b(f). As applied in Massachusetts, that provision results in a distribution of Medicaid benefits to recipients of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) — a class of aged, blind, or disabled persons who lack sufficient income to meet their basic needs — that is more generous than the distribution of such benefits to persons who are self-supporting. Appellees are members of the latter class. Because they must incur medical expenses — for which they are never…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Atkins v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc., Debtor. Randolph F. Jones v. Bank of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Barone v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. In the Matter of Thomas R. Volpert, Jr., Debtor. Appeal of Bernard M. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API