Legal Opinion

Blum v. Bacon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 14, 1982No. 81-770PublishedCited by 322 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

New York has established an Emergency Assistance Program that receives substantial federal funding under Title IV-A of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U. S. C. § 603(a)(5). The program excludes recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) from emergency assistance in the form of cash. It also excludes public assistance recipients (including AFDC recipients) from reimbursement for lost or stolen grants, even though it provides such reimbursement to other public benefit recipients. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that New York’s treatment of AFDC…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by322 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

317 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API