Antoszewski v. City Plumbing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Hally, J. Bill by Anton Antoszewski against the City- Plumbing Company and others to cancel certain conveyances made to the defendants. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In September, 1911, the complainant was, and had been for some time, engaged in the business of shoe repairing, and owned the premises involved in this suit, known as 1278 Rivard street, in the city of Detroit, which he, with his family, occupied as a homestead. The property was incumbered by a mortgage of $1,200. The homestead was all the property which complainant owned, and he claims that he was ignorant of business affairs and uneducated. Having occasion to employ a plumber to do some work in his house, he called in the defendant Frank B. Kuczynski, a countryman of his, with whom he had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wales v. NewbouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- City Bank & Trust Co. v. HurdMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Cornwell Manufacturing Co. v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Cleland v. CasgrainMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Eberle v. HeatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simmons v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Raniak v. PokorneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Simmons v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924