Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Briggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1924No. Civ. No. 2702Published

1Opinion

THE COURT.

In their petition for a rehearing, respondents urge “the fact that Gustavus S. Miller was a minor when the documents in question were executed precludes rescission thereof.” He was over twenty-five years of age when the fourth amended complaint was filed. It is not perceived, therefore, that he stands in any different position than would any other defendant who had innocently received a gift of property procured through the fraud of a third person. The question is whether an innocent recipient of a gift procured to be made through another’s fraud can set up his innocence as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Antoszewski v. City Plumbing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API