Cox v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, Justice.
¶ 1 This is the third appeal between the parties in this matter. Appellant, Kansas City Life, moved that this Court retain this appeal on the ground that the Court had retained and decided an earlier appeal of the matter, Cox v. Kansas City Life, 1997 OK 122, 957 P.2d 1181, decided October 7, 1997. We granted Kansas City Life’s motion to retain the current appeal on September 24, 1998.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The facts and procedural background of this matter are delineated in Cox v. Kansas City Life, 1997 OK 122, 957 P.2d 1181, decided October 7, 1997. In that opinion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Teel v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Brian Overbeek v. Charles Heimbecker, Richard Hellenbrand, and General Casualty Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Traczyk v. TraczykSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Cox v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- In re WheatleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.