Legal Opinion

State v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1995No. 95-469PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The State sought forfeiture of a Chevrolet van that was allegedly used to transport drugs, but was notified that there was a first lien against the van in excess of its market value. The State then sought forfeiture of some of appellees’ other assets that were not mortgaged. The trial court dismissed the action. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Much of our discussion of this case in our decisional conference involved the procedure below and whether the State was required to make a proffer of evidence to preserve its point of appeal. Consequently, we…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Corn v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. State of Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement v. HarnageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. State v. One 1993 Toyota Camry, Vin. No. 4T1SK12EXPU283054Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Nason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API