Legal Opinion

Andersen Consulting LLP v. UOP

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 23, 1998No. 97 C 5501PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Andersen Consulting LLP (“Andersen”), brought an eight count complaint against the defendants, UOP and its counsel, the law firm of Bickel & Brewer. In Count I, Andersen alleges that the defendants knowingly divulged, or caused to be divulged, the contents of Andersen’s e-mail messages in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. In the remaining seven counts, Andersen raises related state law claims against the defendants. The defendants move to dismiss all counts of the complaint.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth T. Hayward, and William B. Krause, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. State Wide Photocopy, Corp. v. Tokai Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re JetBlue Airways Corp. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. In re Michaels Stores Pin Pad LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Conner v. TateDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
  4. Crowley v. Cybersource Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
  5. Carol Walker v. Brian CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API