Legal Opinion

In re Michaels Stores Pin Pad Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 23, 2011No. 11 C 3350PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge:

This case comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant Michaels Stores, Inc. (“Michaels”) to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND1

Michaels is a specialty arts and crafts retailer. Like many other retailers, Michaels uses PIN pads to process customers’ debit and credit card payments. To make a debit or credit card purchase through a PIN pad, a cardholder…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Community Bank of Trenton v. Schnuck Markets, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Irwin v. Jimmy John's Franchise, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Pascal Pour Elle, Ltd. v. JinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. Whalen v. Michael Stores Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Worix v. MedAssets, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API