Legal Opinion
Superior Communications v. Earhugger, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 18, 2009No. CV 08-3088-PA(RCx)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL INTERROGATORY RESPONSES AND GRANTING, IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENT REQUESTS
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On January 28, 2009, plaintiff filed a notice of motion and motion to compel discovery, a joint stipulation, and the supporting declaration of Patrick F. Bright.1 Neither party has filed a supplemental memorandum. Oral argument was held on February 18, 2009, before Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman.
BACKGROUND
On May 12, 2008, plaintiff Superior Communications, a California…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. International Union Of Petroleum And Industrial Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Synopsys, Inc. v. ATopTech, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Independent Living Center v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- (PC) Tran v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- ATX NETWORKS (TORONTO) CORP. v. TECHNETIX, INC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Amazing Ins., Inc. v. DiMannoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.