Legal Opinion
Amazing Ins., Inc. v. DiManno
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 10, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01349Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMAZING INSURANCE, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01349-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MICHAEL A. DIMANNO and ACCUIRE, LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 MICHAEL A. DIMANNO and ACCUIRE, LLC, 19 Counter-Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 VIKASH JAIN, GERALD D. 22 ANDERTON, KARA CHILDRESS, and ALEX CAMPOS, 23 Third-Party Defendants. 24 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 1 Before the court are two motions to compel filed by defendants: (1) a motion to compel 2 production against plaintiff and third-party defendants, and (2) a motion to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Stormans Inc v. Mary SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.