Legal Opinion

Henington v. State Board of Bar Examiners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1956No. 5987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

Harry C. Henington, plaintiff (appellant), asked the Board of Bar Examiners to permit him to take the New Mexico bar examination. He tendered his application accompanied by the required examination fee, but did not enclose with said application a diploma or a properly authenticated certificate showing his graduation from an accredited law school, nor a certificate of an attorney of this state that he is a person of good moral character as is provided by rule.

Rule 1, § 2 reads as follows:

“No person, other than those admitted on certificate from other states, shall be granted a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. In Re SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. In Re LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. BergeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Hackin v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Application of HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re SchatzWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In Re StephensonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API