Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining Committee
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 21, 1933PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
In his petition, the applicant sets forth that he has complied with all the requirements for permission to take the examination for admission to the bar; that he had attended the session of the examining committee at New Haven June 23d, 1932, for the examination of applicants; and that, thereafter, he was notified by the secretary of the examining committee that he had satisfactorily passed, but the committee refused to certify his name to the clerk of the court for admission on the ground that the school in which he had studied law was not approved by the committee in accordance with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.