Legal Opinion
Hill v. Bedell
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 7, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
The action is tort for the alleged conversion of certain personal property which the defendants had previously mortgaged to the plaintiff. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment below, and the case is here on defendants’ exceptions.
At the close of all the evidence, the defendant, A. J. Bedell, Jr., moved for a directed verdict as to him on the ground that the ease “was barren” of evidence that he sold, disposed of, or otherwise converted the property, which motion was denied and he had an exception.
While there was no evidence that he, himself, actually sold or disposed of any of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crampton v. Valido Marble Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Clark v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
- D. M. Osborne Co. v. Plano Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SidwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Meyette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Johnson v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Parker Et Ux. v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.