Legal Opinion

United States v. Eduardo Sandoval-Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2006No. 04-10118PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

This drug conspiracy case presents two principal issues. The first is whether the district court erred in ordering defense counsel not to talk to his client during an overnight recess. The second is whether the district court abused its discretion in excluding expert testimony about the defendant’s subnormal intelligence. We reverse.

FACTS

Twin brothers, Eduardo and Ricardo Sandoval-Mendoza, were convicted of conspiring to sell methamphetamine. Eduardo Sandoval-Mendoza sold the drugs. He argues that the government entrapped him as a matter of law. He also argues that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Linda Messick v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Maria Elosu v. Middlefork Ranch IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API