Legal Opinion

Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 23, 2004No. 03-1285, 03-1313Published

1Opinion of the Court

365 F.3d 1306

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and Beecham Group, P.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

APOTEX CORP., Apotex, INC., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

No. 03-1285.

No. 03-1313.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 23, 2004.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Ford F. Farabow, Jr., Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Robert D. Bajefsky, Howard W. Levine, Scott J. Popma, Jennifer S. Swan, Aaron M. Raphael.

Deanne M. Mazzochi, Lord, Bissell & Brock, of Chicago, Illinois,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API