Legal Opinion
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 8, 2005No. 2003-1285Published
1Opinion of the Court
403 F.3d 1331
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and Beecham Group, P.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
APOTEX CORP., Apotex, Inc., and TorPharm, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.
No. 03-1285.
No. 03-1313.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
DECIDED: April 8, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Ford F. Farabow, Jr., Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Robert D. Bajefsky, Howard W. Levine, Scott J. Popma, Jennifer S. Swan, Aaron M. Raphael.
Deanne M. Mazzochi, Lord, Bissell & Brook, of Chicago,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.