Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1929No. 21487. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

Respondent was injured while riding as a passenger on a street car owned and operated by appellant, and this action was instituted to recover damages therefor. The case was tried before the court with a jury, judgment rendered in favor of the city of Seattle, and a new trial granted solely by reason of the fact that the jury were improperly instructed on the question of negligence; and from the order granting a new trial, this appeal is taken.

The court instructed the jury on the theory that appellant, in the operation of its street cars, owed to respondent ordinary care, whereas this court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Seattle Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wait v. Robertson Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cerini v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hammond v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Cook v. SkinnerWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Sellman v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wiggins v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Fagerdahl v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API