Legal Opinion

Fagerdahl v. North Coast Transportation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. 24710. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injury which, it was alleged, the plaintiff Arne Fagerdahl sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of twenty thousand dollars.' At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, and also at the conclusion of all the evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof, and moved for a directed verdict; which motions were overruled. After the verdict, the defendant moved for new trial, which motion was granted, on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grass v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Adams v. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. May v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Humphreys v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Legal Adjustment Bureau v. West Coast Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. BauersWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Corp. v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hayes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Fagerdahl v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API