Legal Opinion

Cook v. Skinner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1907No. 6603PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Poindexter, J., entered September 1, 1906, granting a new trial, after a trial on the merits and the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action for fraud.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This appeal is taken from an order granting a new trial upon the motion of the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

The action was brought to recover from the defendant a certain tract of land in Spokane county, upon the alleged ground that the defendant acquired the land from plaintiffs by fraud. Issues were joined and a trial was had before the court and a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the defendant. Thereupon the plaintiffs filed a motion for new trial, upon the following grounds: “(1) Irregularity in the proceeding to the court and jury, by which plaintiffs were prevented from having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Latimer v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Colvin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humphreys v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API