Raabe v. Coy
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
The defendants, Walter Coy and Dorothy Coy, appeal from a summary judgment quieting title to the Hi-Line Theatre property in the plaintiffs, Buford W. and Josephine Raabe.
That the parties and the subject matter of this lawsuit are not strangers to the judicial process is emphatically revealed by reference to our Supreme Court decisions in Graham v. Raabe, 62 Wn.2d 753, 384 P.2d 629 (1963); Coy v. Raabe, 69 Wn.2d 346, 418 P.2d 728 (1966); Coy v. Raabe, 77 Wn.2d 322, 462 P.2d 214 (1969).
The lengthy record of litigation1 which was a prelude to this action is related in detail in the prior cases…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- W. G. Platts, Inc. v. PlattsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Coy v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Coy v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Tacoma Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- de St. Romaine v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971