Vozar v. Francis
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.
Paul and Sandra Vozar, the plaintiffs in the Superior Court, and Richard and Kay Francis, the defendants, executed a document called an “Option to Purchase Agreement.” Under its terms, plaintiffs agreed to rent to defendants a certain lot with a house on it in or near Kenai, Alaska, with an option to purchase the property. Payment “of the said property” was to be $250.00 a month including interest at nine percent per annum. The agreement provided that if defendants “abides [sic] by the State of Alaska Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and desires in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Martin v. MaldonadoAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Tsakres v. OwensAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Norton v. HerronAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. SpearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Karakehian v. BoyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Gyurkey v. BablerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.