Legal Opinion

Vozar v. Francis

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1978No. 3173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.

Paul and Sandra Vozar, the plaintiffs in the Superior Court, and Richard and Kay Francis, the defendants, executed a document called an “Option to Purchase Agreement.” Under its terms, plaintiffs agreed to rent to defendants a certain lot with a house on it in or near Kenai, Alaska, with an option to purchase the property. Payment “of the said property” was to be $250.00 a month including interest at nine percent per annum. The agreement provided that if defendants “abides [sic] by the State of Alaska Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and desires in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Martin v. MaldonadoAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Tsakres v. OwensAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Norton v. HerronAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. SpearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Karakehian v. BoyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Gyurkey v. BablerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API