Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gyurkey v. Babler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1982No. 13466Published

1DissentShepard, Justice

The majority plows new ground in the law of a right of first refusal. It holds that *671a holder of a right of first refusal must be given written notice. It further holds that such notice must include information of transactions far beyond the property which is subject to the right of first refusal. I find no support for those conclusions in the law of this or any other jurisdiction. The majority sidesteps the fact that this matter was tried and following trial, lengthy and comprehensive findings of fact were entered. In my judgment those findings are supported by sufficient and competent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Myers v. LovetinskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Killam v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API