Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Keystone Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1980No. 225PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

Appellee Mitchell Gordon was involved in an automobile accident on March 14, 1977 with one Duane A. Craig. Craig was insured by Ohio Casualty Company, with policy limits of $15,000, the minimum amount required by Pennsylvania law. Appellee settled with Craig for $15,000, then sought recovery (under an uninsured motorist clause) from his own insurance company, Keystone, appellant herein, for damages in excess of the $15,000 which he had recovered from Craig. Appellee sought to proceed in arbitration (pursuant to the terms of the Act of 1927), since the contract of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Blocker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Women's Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. SavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. United Steelworkers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Ostroff v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Hade v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. State Farm Insurance v. BullockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API