Legal Opinion
Hoyt v. City of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 21, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
This is an appeal from an appraisal of damages and assessment of benefits based upon the widening of Summer Street in Stamford, taken to a judge of the Superior Court under the provisions of the charter of the city. 17 Special Laws, p. 586, § 223. Two pieces of property are involved, one owned by the appellants Komenak and the other by the appellants Hoyt, The charter of the city provides that an appeal from an appraisal of damages or assessment of benefits shall consist of a written petition for a reassessment or reappraisal, and that the judge may reassess the benefits and damages and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gustafson v. RustemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Munson v. MacDonald, Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Commonwealth Fuel Co. v. McNeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- G. F. Heublein, Inc. v. Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Young v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Appeal of Cohen From Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Fox v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Faille v. HollettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. Giant's Neck Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Vigue v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.