Vigue v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment holding it liable to pay $500 to the plaintiff as beneficiary of an industrial life insurance policy on the life of Rose Vigue. We are handicapped in our consideration of the ease by the manner in which the pleadings were drafted, and we are precluded from a review on the merits by the defective way in which the appeal record was prepared.
In its answer, the defendant admitted the first thirteen words of paragraph four of the complaint and denied the last twenty-two words. It then departed from the established practice of setting up matters in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Town of West Hartford v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Hoyt v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Faille v. HollettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. ReinosaConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
- Berty v. GorelickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Qsp, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co., No. 326873 (Dec. 7, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Town of Brookfield v. Boulder Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.