Legal Opinion

Faille v. Hollett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alcoeít, J.

The defendants, owners of a dwelling, appeal from a judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall caused by a dangerous condition in the defendants’ premises. The issues raised by the pleadings were the negligence of the defendants and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. The correctness of the court’s decision on these issues is attacked by the appeal.

The finding contains only the subordinate facts, and the conclusions based thereon, relating to the issue of the defendants’ negligence. It sets forth no conclusion on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Laube v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Cappiello v. HaselmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Salvatore v. MilickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Ford v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Postemski v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API