Commonwealth Fuel Co. v. McNeil
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
This action is brought to recover damages because of the representations made to the plaintiff by the defendant with reference to the Connecticut company and the Coke company, upon the ground that they were false and fraudulent.
Much of the contention of the defendant in this court consists in an attempt to secure corrections of the finding of the trial court. Unless this attempt prevails to such an extent as to make the conclusions of the court erroneous, it is obvious, from a reading of the finding, that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment, and the questions remaining concern the measure…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.