Rohr v. Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
It is apparent that the plaintiff’s attorney labored under the misapprehension that he was entitled to a voluntary nonsuit as a matter of course. Such is not the law. The authorities in this jurisdiction upon that question were recently fully reviewed in Obermeier v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. 177 Wis. 490, 188 N. W. 603, resulting in the conclusion that a motion for a voluntary nonsuit, even though made before argument of the cause to the jury, is addressed *109to the sound discretion of the court. The denial of plaintiff’s motion for a nonsuit was therefore within the power of the court, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Obermeier v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pear v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Klapinski v. PolewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Krueger v. WintersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Nelson v. DevneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Baker, Fentress & Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932