Legal Opinion

Obermeier v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

Plaintiff asserts that she had an absolute right to dismiss her action against the defendant during the trial thereof and at any time before the argument to the jury had been concluded and cites sec. 2856, Stats., reading as follows:

“The plaintiff shall have no right to submit to a nonsuit after the argument of the cause to the jury upon the testimony shall have been concluded or waived.”

This provision first appears in the Revised Statutes of 1878 under the same section number. Prior to that time it seems to have been the circuit court rule. Taylor’s Revision of 1871, p. 2015.

It is argued…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Derick v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Anderson v. Horlick's Malted Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KenyonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Guinther v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Pear v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Nelson v. DevneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. Rohr v. Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API