Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Winters

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue before this court on appeal is: Should the plaintiff be allowed to disclaim or waive an item of damages in the special verdict thereby expunging the effect of a dissent to that item so as to cure an otherwise defective verdict?

The pertinent statute is sec. 270.25 (1), which provides :

“Verdicts; five-sixths; directed. (1) A verdict agreed to by five-sixths of the jurors shall be the verdict of the jury. If more than one question must be answered to arrive at a verdict on the same cause of action, the same five-sixths of the jurors must agree on all such questions.”

This court has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Gummer v. Trustees of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Kowalke v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Scipior v. SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gratz v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John T. Patzer v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and State Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Giese v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Young v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gustavson v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API