Legal Opinion

Brock v. Cato

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1947No. 31504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

Ground 4 of the amended motion for a new trial is not meritorious. While it would have been, no doubt, more appropriate and fitting for the court, in explaining to the jury for the purpose of the bond which the motor carriers in this State are required to file with the Public Service Commission under Code, § 68-612, to point out in terms of the statute that the bond is filed for the protection of the public against injury “proximately caused by the negligence of such motor carrier, its servants or agents,” the court at this point was merely explaining the presence of Maryland Casualty Company…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Augusta & Summerville Railroad v. Randall & WifeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Betts Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Olliff v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valdosta Housing Authority v. FinnesseeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Carithers v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Camp v. MappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. MacDonald v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API