Legal Opinion

Smith v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1947No. 31730PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

In considering the ruling of the court disallowing the amendment we are mindful of the rule of law that conduct not amounting to a justification for an assault and battery may nevertheless be pleaded and proved in extenuation or mitigation of damages. Code, § 105-1802; Robinson v. DeVaughn, 59 Ga. App. 37, 52 (200 S. E. 213), and citations. This rule of law seems to contemplate that the jury may consider “the actions and conduct of the plaintiff at the time of the assault,” with other facts, in determining whether the defendant was justified, and if not justified, what effect should be given…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harris v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Becker v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Brown v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Coart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dixon v. DarnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Gentile v. Miller, Stevenson & Steinichen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Cornelius v. MacOn-bibb County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Samples v. SamplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Tucker v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API