Legal Opinion

Oaks v. Twin City Foods, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1993No. Docket 142308PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is another appeal in which we are called upon to address the scope of the intentional tort exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act. Plaintiff appeals as of right a circuit court order entering summary disposition in favor of defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm.

The exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act and its exception for intentional torts is embodied in MCL 418.131(1); MSA 17.237(131)(1). This statute provides as follows:

The right to the recovery of benefits as provided in this act shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pawlak v. Redox Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. McNees v. Cedar Springs Stamping Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Adams v. Shepherd Products, US, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Benson v. Callahan Mining Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Phillips v. Ludvanwall, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palazzola v. Karmazin Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Agee v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. House v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Luce v. Kent Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Bradley, Jr. v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API