Legal Opinion
McNees v. Cedar Springs Stamping Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1990No. Docket 118117PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals from the orders of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition and denying plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint.
This case involves the intentional tort exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131) (hereafter, § 131). Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in finding that the 1987 amendment of the act should be applied retroactively. In Schefsky v The Evening News Ass'n 169 Mich App 223, 227-228; 425 NW2d 768 (1988), this Court held that the amendment to § 131 was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Formall, Inc. v. Community National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. LembleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schefsky v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tolbert v. U S Truck Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Tolliver v. Kroger Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Gonyea v. Motor Parts Federal Credit UnionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Liggett Restaurant Group, Inc. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.