Legal Opinion
Fritschle v. Andes
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 9, 1998No. Civ.AMD. 98-1694PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
This action was brought by Mark and Diane Fritsehle, (the “Fritschles”), in their own right and on behalf of their son, Mark Andrew (“Drew”), pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The Fritschles allege that the Worcester County Board of Education, and its Superintendent, John M. Andes, (together, “WCBE”) denied Drew a free appropriate public education, (“FAPE”). On December 4,1997, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that WCBE violated the IDEA and deprived Drew of a FAPE in 1995-96 by failing to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Debra Rogers v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Joseph Spiegler v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Gadsby v. GrasmickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cavanagh v. GrasmickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- J.D.G. & Tiby S. Gomez v. Colonial School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Kirkpatrick v. Lenoir County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Fritschle v. AndesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Carnwath v. GrasmickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.