Legal Opinion

Asher v. Hald

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1990No. 87-1834-J-2; CA A48989Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant doctor. The trial court concluded that the action was time-barred under ORS 12.110(4) as a matter of law. Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred because there is a genuine issue of material fact. ORCP 47C. We reverse.

Plaintiff testified in a deposition that defendant surgically removed a lymph node from his neck on October 22, 1981. During the incision, plaintiff felt a sharp pain that went to his shoulder. Plaintiff returned to the doctor two or three times in the next two weeks,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frohs v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Peterson v. Multnomah County School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Hoffman v. RockeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Duncan v. AugterOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Roby's Enterprises, Inc. v. Hanover Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API