Duncan v. Augter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
By virtue of a 1971 statute, an otherwise untimely damage action arising from medical treatment may be commenced within two years of the actual or reasonable discovery of a "fraud, deceit, or misleading representation” that caused the action not to be timely brought. ORS 12.110(4). The issue before us is whether a surgeon’s statement that he removed plaintiff’s appendix was a "misleading representation” permitting a delayed commencement of an action against the surgeon, if the statement led plaintiff’s physicians not to suspect the cause of her subsequent abdominal illness.
The defendant…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Hoffner v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Tomlinson v. GeorgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Duncan v. AugterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.