Legal Opinion
Anonymous v. Anonymous
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 9, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSi cher, J.
These are two companion proceedings. It has been stipulated that they be tried together and that all evidence be deemed to have been taken simultaneously in each of them.
Under one petition (Docket No. 744 —1940) petitioner Miriam C. (formerly Miriam R.) seeks support from respondent John C. both for herself as his alleged wife and also for her infant son Michael as the alleged child of that respondent.
Under the other petition (Docket Nos. 835-836 — 1940) she seeks in that child’s behalf support also from respondents Robert C. and L. C. (the parents of respondent John C.) as its alleged…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Betz v. HorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Cunningham v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- People Ex Rel. Lawton v. . SnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Magner v. HobbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- In re the Accounting of VincentNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- Standish v. StandishNew York Family Court · 1943
- In re the Accounting of GarretsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- Bloch v. EwingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.