Magner v. Hobby
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Chief Judge.
The appellees are a mother and her minor child who is under the age of eighteen and who claimed, as the wife and child respectively of George H. Magner, certain insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The claims were denied and there was a final administrative affirmance of the denial by the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration. The appellees then brought this suit.
The first cause of action is in behalf of the child for child’s monthly benefits under §§ 202(d) and 216(e) of the Act, Sections 402(d) and 416(e) of Title 42 U.S.C.A.1 The second cause…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Caldwell v. CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Querze v. QuerzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Matter of LindgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Olmsted v. . OlmstedNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Flamm v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Grove v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
- Hobby v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- McGuire v. CalifanoDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1977
- Roston v. FolsomDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.