Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 18, 1996No. 95-0532; Crim.App. No. 30599PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, of premeditated murder, burglary, and larceny, in violation of Articles 118, 129, and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 918, 929, and 921, respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for life, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence. 41 MJ 701 (1995). We granted review of the following issues:

I

WHETHER THE APPEALS…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. ToroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. FaisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API