Legal Opinion

United States v. Katherine Bordallo Aguon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1988No. 85-1318PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

A three-judge panel of this court reversed Aguon’s convictions for extortion and conspiracy in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and her convictions for making false statements before a grand jury and conspiracy to obstruct justice. United States v. Aguon, 813 F.2d 1413 (9th Cir.1987) {Aguon I). At the suggestion of the government, the case was taken en banc. 831 F.2d 1487 (9th Cir.1987).

Upon rehearing en banc, we are presented with three questions:(1) whether we should retain the rule established in United States v. McClelland, 731 F.2d 1438 (9th…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API