In the Interest of B.L.M. and Jr., Children
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction
Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Appellant J.M.’s parent-child relationship -with his daughter, B.L.M., and son, J.L.M., should be terminated and entered judgment accordingly. In six issues, J.M. complains that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the statutory grounds relied upon by the trial court to terminate his parental rights and that the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (“TDPRS”) violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”) in the course of its treatment of him. We will affirm.
II.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- A. P. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2025
- C. C. F. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
- In Re BLMCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In the Interest of J.G.S. Minor Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
- Renee Rodriguez v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.