Legal Opinion

Stead v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1931No. 28,188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In this action to recover the agreed commission for the sale of defendant’s farm of 240 acres plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appeals from the judgment entered thereon.

On July 5, 1927, plaintiff, a real estate agent or broker, for the named consideration of one dollar secured from defendant a written contract appointing plaintiff “exclusive agent to make sale” of defendant’s farm in Fillmore county for $125 an acre, $1,000 down, $10,000 cash March 1, and balance secured by mortgage for ten years at five per cent. The-contract provided for a commission of one dollar per acre on the sale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Smith v. PreissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Baars v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Mester v. FritzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API