Stead v. Erickson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In this action to recover the agreed commission for the sale of defendant’s farm of 240 acres plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appeals from the judgment entered thereon.
On July 5, 1927, plaintiff, a real estate agent or broker, for the named consideration of one dollar secured from defendant a written contract appointing plaintiff “exclusive agent to make sale” of defendant’s farm in Fillmore county for $125 an acre, $1,000 down, $10,000 cash March 1, and balance secured by mortgage for ten years at five per cent. The-contract provided for a commission of one dollar per acre on the sale…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Smith v. PreissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Baars v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Mester v. FritzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004