Legal Opinion

Mester v. Fritze

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1963No. 38,766PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action for personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $10,000, which was subsequently reduced to $8,000 by the trial court. This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial on the grounds that (1) the verdict even as reduced was excessive; and (2) the trial court erred in certain of its instructions to the jury.

The facts are as follows: The accident occurred February 20, 1960, about 10:30 p. m. at the intersection of Payne and Maryland…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Larson v. DegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SerraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Froysland v. Leef Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Janet R. Johnson, Trustee v. Richard Serra, and Milgo Industrial, Inc., a Corporation, and Milgo Art(s) Systems, Inc., and Third-Party v. Pratt's Express Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API