Legal Opinion

Frost Vacationland Properties, Inc. v. Palmer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 22, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] James and Linda Palmer appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Aroos-took County, Pierson, J.) affirming a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Houlton, Griffiths, J.) in favor of Frost Va-cationland Properties, Inc. (Vaeationland) in its forcible entry and detainer (FED) action pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 6001 (Supp.1998). 1 The Palmers argue that Vacationland’s FED action is precluded because they are dissei-sors that have acquired a claim by possession and improvement. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

[¶ 2] The facts in the light most favorable to the Palmers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenvall v. Maine Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Rubin v. JosephsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Sweeney v. DahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  5. Melanson v. MathesonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John A. Thurston v. Jenny G. GalvinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Wood v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Town of Blue Hill v. LeightonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. Bureau v. GendronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. John A. Thurston v. Jenny G. GalvinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API