Frost Vacationland Properties, Inc. v. Palmer
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] James and Linda Palmer appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Aroos-took County, Pierson, J.) affirming a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Houlton, Griffiths, J.) in favor of Frost Va-cationland Properties, Inc. (Vaeationland) in its forcible entry and detainer (FED) action pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 6001 (Supp.1998). 1 The Palmers argue that Vacationland’s FED action is precluded because they are dissei-sors that have acquired a claim by possession and improvement. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
[¶ 2] The facts in the light most favorable to the Palmers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greenvall v. Maine Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Rubin v. JosephsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Sweeney v. DahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
- Melanson v. MathesonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John A. Thurston v. Jenny G. GalvinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Wood v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Town of Blue Hill v. LeightonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Bureau v. GendronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- John A. Thurston v. Jenny G. GalvinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.