Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1995No. Nos. 14509 and 14514PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendants-appellants the city of Dayton and J. Wesley Trimble, Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, appeal from a judgment, following a jury verdict, declaring that plaintiff-appellee, Gary L. Douglas, is entitled to participate in the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Fund. Case No. 14509 is the city’s appeal; case No. 14514 is the Administrator’s appeal. Although each defendant has appealed, only the city has filed a brief in support of its appeal. Consequently, we assume that the Administrator has chosen not to raise any issues or to assert any assignments of error…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Wells v. Miami Valley HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Small v. Defiance Public LibraryOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McRoberts v. Gen. Elec. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Sommer v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Towles v. MillerCoors, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Gomez v. Sauder Woodworking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API