Legal Opinion

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 28, 1967No. C.D. 3093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar, invoiced as “Sheepskin Coats,” was manufactured by Morlands of Glastonbury, Somerset, England. It was classified under paragraph 1519(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem as articles manufactured wholly or in chief value of fur. Plaintiff claims the involved sheepskin coats properly classifiable at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1531 of said act, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Domestic Broadtail Producers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Loewengart v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API